Introduction
Consider the possibility of a full-sensory story, something like a motion picture, only more so, or like virtual reality, only even richer in information. The story is created from real perception—things that you can see, hear, touch, taste, and smell. Perceptions and states of consciousness flow into a kind of narrative, not necessarily in a straight line, more a sort of cloud or swarm, vaguely organized—though not always—along an axis of time. Even in that disorganization, the flow of attention, the part of the plot we follow through the swarm, may zig and zag from any perception to almost any other, the entirety of the story only becoming clear after we have partaken of thousands and thousands of memories, feelings, and experiences.
It’s the ultimate medium: a palette of every color, sound, feeling, scent, and flavor. It can be populated with multitudes of characters—family, friends, lovers, teachers, neighbors, strangers, good guys, bad guys, heroes, schmucks, and everyone else. It can be beautifully simple or complex beyond the rendering of any supercomputer. If you were the author of this amazing, full-sensory story, think about the kinds of choices you could make. When the plot arc, the scope of the tale, finally rises into view, just what kind of story do you hope it will be?
There are billions of people with access to this exciting medium—but only some of them even realize that they are the authors, the directors, and the producers of their own full-sensory story. Shakespeare told us that we are but players; what he failed to mention is that, like him, we can also turn the tale toward our own aesthetic ends. Of the few humans who even think about their world enough to realize their own artistic control, only a few have figured out the techniques. The result is that many of the full-sensory stories out there—billions of them—really suck. Or, for the most part, they are repetitive, predictable, and unremarkable lives based around B-movie (or worse!) plots.
The question then becomes—how much do you want your own story to really rock? How exquisite, grand, powerful, intriguing, seductive, exciting, or mythic would you like your experience to be? What excites your neurons, strokes your sense of aesthetics, fulfills your philosophy, applies significance to your circumstance, or makes you scream and shout? Whatever it is that puts the sauce on the omelet, the brushstroke to the Starry Night, the bubbles in the Jacuzzi, the ecstasy in viewing a blue arc of summer sky, we shall refer to here as woohoo.
Woohoo is the subtle difference between ordinary and exciting, the factor that makes just another stranger into your friend, your teacher, or your lover. Woohoo is what turns an activity into a passion; it’s what changes noise into song, foot movement into dance, travel into adventure, procreation into eros, and biological processes into a life worth living. Woohoo is the measure of intensity. It’s what continues to draw your attention, moment after moment. It’s what makes a feeling worth having. Like the Tao, true woohoo has no definite form. Your personal way of woohoo cannot be named; it is a flow of experience that changes from moment to moment.
Woohoo can be thought of as more of a how than a what. A camera angle may make the difference between a home video and awe-inspiring cinematography. A nuance of pitch or timbre might separate a technically correct piano recital from a heartfelt virtuoso performance. Duration and subtlety of movement might make the difference between a goodnight kiss and an exciting erotic invitation. How we perceive may determine the quality of woohoo as much as what we perceive the content of that experience. The way that we process our sensory input includes, somewhere along the way, the decision to put our inner artist to work, for our brains to portray our experience with the right camera angle, the sweetest emphasis of tone, or with erotic subtlety. That decision, to woohoo or not to woohoo, usually happens outside of our conscious awareness. We can, however, make it a conscious choice.
The pursuit of a woohoo-filled life story, whatever the details of that might be for you, is the Way of Woohoo.
The Model of Meta-Magick
Magick, as we’re using the term here, refers to a means of first perfecting the self so that the things that one may do will be done with power and effectiveness. This has always been the aim of magick—to understand the relationship between consciousness and the world in a way that allows us to re-create ourselves (and our world) in hedonic, healthy, and practical ways. Our understanding and self-perfection allow us to fit into the world so well that we can influence it in accordance with our will.
Meta-Magick is a collection of opportunities to think about magick. Elements from a variety of theories and models, ranging from neuroscience to voodoo, are offered as clues to understand the phenomena we find in our magical experiments. There are many different styles and practices of magick, in every culture, on every continent. By identifying some of the common elements, we are better able to separate out the magick itself, the techniques and practices that really work, from the content of the rituals that relates to specific belief systems. In general, many techniques of magick are the same everywhere, with their intent aimed at different results and deities. This suggests that the rituals and practices derive from the commonality of human experience; this is how our brains work when we do magick.
Our focus will be on the magical operation of invocation. If you are already familiar with magick and invocation techniques, you may be able to use the exercises in this book to identify the behaviors and experiences that make those techniques effective for you. If you are completely new to these concepts (relax, all will be explained soon.), you can use the methods given here as building blocks for your own techniques and magical rituals.
We’ll start with a premise that magick is, at least in one important way, like every other human behavior: it derives from the interplay of our mind/body and the world. Anything that we can do, magically or otherwise, will be represented by corresponding processes in our brains, our bodies, and our behavior. While that may not be all that happens, it offers us important clues to how we can replicate magical results and utilize the tools that we have—our perceptions and abilities.
Two questions to keep in mind while experimenting with this book are: “Which of my behaviors contribute to making magick?” and “How can I use those behaviors to create maximum woohoo in my life?”
Experimental results will undoubtedly differ from person to person. Ultimately, the model of magick and the direction that you take toward increased woohoo can be unique to you. There are no right or wrong results for any of the experiments. Whatever happens becomes data for your own map to the realm of woohoo. In short, this is magick about magick, rituals and techniques designed to help us understand more about rituals and magical techniques. When we begin to work with others and compare results, we may be able to create more generalized models of magick.
Meta-Magick exercises can be practiced as a separate system of magick; however, it is just as interesting to apply the insights gained from this exploration to a practice or system you may already be familiar with. Or use these techniques to develop your own, personal system of magick from scratch. Or find the woohoo wherever it may lie and gather it into everything you see, hear, feel, taste, and smell throughout your life. In short, use this book to bring some woohoo to whatever you do.
The Model of Science
Think of science, like Meta-Magick, as a means for creating models. An all-too-common perception of science is that it deals in authoritative facts—truths that are immutably recorded in peer-reviewed journals and blessed by academia. In actuality, science is a method of inquiry that generates theories. Theories are forms of metaphor that explain a body of data, although scientists often may shy away from admitting the metaphoric quality. Metaphors are rarely perfect and almost always leave a lot of room for interpretation. Theories are updated, hopefully on a regular basis, to best fit the map of the world we operate from.
The bits and pieces of neuroscience that illustrate the ideas in this book are by no means definitive—and it is likely that my interpretation of those bits and pieces may be quite different from that of the scientists who proposed them. As this is a book about the magical art of invocation, not neuroscience, we will explore only a tiny portion of the huge and complex subject of the human brain. This is done as a way of building operating metaphors and not, by any means, a complete or necessarily “true” map of neurological functions. These theories can help develop the hypotheses that we use to initiate our experiments and, as “operating metaphors,” they help build a frame through which to view and understand our responses.
The more important parts of this book, the exercises, provide a framework for creating experiments. Consider your explorations of woohoo as a process of personal scientific inquiry, with your own consciousness as laboratory. For those not already familiar with scientific method, the steps are fairly simple:
1. The scientist creates a hypothesis. A hypothesis is an educated guess at an outcome that we can test with an experiment. For instance, “If I read this book and practice the exercises, I’ll learn something about magick and the brain.”
2. An experiment is designed to test the hypothesis. In this case, the experiment might be actually reading the book and practicing the exercises, and then testing your knowledge of magick against what it was prior to reading and practicing.
3. After repeated experiments—perhaps involving other people reading and practicing, or perhaps reading and practicing from other magick books—a theory can be formed. The theory might be a denial or confirmation of the hypothesis, or it might be something else entirely, deduced from the experience.
In short, I hope that you will be scientific in this personal way, that you will perform the experiments and eventually, when you think you have enough data, draw your own conclusions about the processes of invocation and the nature of woohoo.
Do the experiments and draw your own conclusions.