Electromagnetics

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

Big Seven Crypto Study

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

Media_and_Society:_Summer_2019

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

Remove the Bridge Crossing

As I am now cleaning up the Puzzle wikibooks on Puzzles/River Crossing , I came across this pages that needed to be deleted due to the pages are listed as list of puzzles which does not add depth to the puzzle wikibooks (which was causing the book to be nominated for deletion at first place) also this was duplicate of the contents I will be writing later on :

1. Puzzles/Logic puzzles/Bridge Crossing/Solution
2. Puzzles/Logic puzzles/Bridge Crossing
3. Puzzles/How do you ... ?/Crossing the Bridge
4. Puzzles/How do you ... ?/Crossing the Bridge/Solution

Exercise as it relates to Disease/Feeling hot for health

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

Undergraduate Mathematics

The scope of this book is too broad. The Linear Algebra wikibook is a good example of what such a project could be. I came up with the idea yonks ago on undergrad myself and no-one else has taken interest, because I was new to the platform and sketching out ideas.

I'm happy to contribute to other projects, I just don't want people to click this malformed idea instead.

Knittedbees (discuss • contribs) 08:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Question: Knittedbees many of the pages have a rich history, but I noticed on the logs of some that they were imported in May 2014. Is the bulk of the existing content simply imported from English Wikipedia in 2014? --Jules (Mrjulesd) 21:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes, the idea was to use Wikipedia as a template, but pretty much writing a few books like Analysis, Algebra and Dynamics from scratch focusing on exercises and worked examples would be a better approach (i.e. nothing like the Wikipedia articles I tried importing). (logged out Knittedbees) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.2.57.14 (talk • contribs) 23:13, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Delete it has a lot of content but as explained above they are merely imported articles from Wikipedia in 2014. As such, readers would be better off reading the updated articles on Wikpedia than reading this book. So it makes sense to get rid of it. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 23:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

• As someone with experience in undergrad mathematics, I think the topics in this book are better off as independent wikibooks. Instead, I would favour creating a category of topics that are suitable for undergraduate-level mathematics. P.S: some of the topics are in the wrong category. Stokes' theorem and line integral are in vector calculus, not complex analysis (and there's nothing complex-valued in them, though ideas in line integrals pop up when doing contours and working out complex integrals). Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 11:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Intellectual Property and the Internet/Arab Spring

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

Euclid's Elements

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

Centrelink help

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

NVQ Carpentry Level 2

I believe this book needs to be deleted as it contains dangerous information which will put lives at risk for all on site, due to the abundance of miss information contained with in the pages. This book also contains some references from publications which are out of date and plagiarised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.106.244 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

For perspective, this appears to have started with a comment on the book's talk page by a registered user (who hasn't made any edit on any project afaics), after which an IP6 seconded the criticism and then undid itself, and then the above IP also supported the criticism and also posted here. (I've added a section heading to contain those remarks on the book talk page.) --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 18:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Question to 86.182.106.244: can you give any examples of how this book "contains dangerous information" or "miss information" (sic), or is "out of date" or "plagiarised"? Generally books should be fixed rather than discarded if possible. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 00:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Keep Vote keep. Encik Tekateki (discuss • contribs) 01:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints "Church Meetings" page

The page The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints/Church Meetings Has information that could be easily put into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints/Church Service The page should probably be deleted, and the information from the former page moved to the latter, considering that the "Church Meetings" page only has three sentences of information in it. PeanutHat (discuss • contribs) 08:01, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Suggest merge and redirect: I don't think this particularly needs deletion, as this would do the job in as satisfactory manner. If doing this please attribute the merged content from the source page. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 10:51, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

I think this should be merged with other information on the same subject instead of deleted. User:Abdul_turban — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdul turban (talk • contribs)

Monopoly rules

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

How To Succeed in College

Like the previous post, I started this book thinking I would have the time to work on it. I started this book 7 years ago at a time when I thought I would be able to dedicate a fair amount of time to it. Since then, I have not been able to work on it and do not envision having the time to work on it in the future. As the principal author, I encourage the community to delete the book. --Rcragun (discuss • contribs) 15:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

@Rcragun: about this and Statistics for Sociology above: if you are the only contributor then WB:SPEEDY applies. Add {{delete|Nominated by the only significant contributor: please delete all pages in book.}} to the main pages. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 10:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Done. Thank you. --Rcragun (discuss • contribs) 14:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Fire Simulation for Engineers

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

Chess Opening Theory/1. a4/1...e5/2. Ra3

This page doesn't contribute anything meaningful to the book. 96.234.224.176 (discuss) 03:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Could you please further clarify your standings?

Asked by Encik Tekateki (discuss • contribs) 06:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Keep I don't see any problem with it. Sure, there it's a stub, but that isn't a reason to delete. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 12:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Sunvox Reference

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

GCSE Physics

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

How to Convert Videos for the iPod

Nominate to delete this due to there are many instructional texts at Wikihow projects:

https://www.wikihow.com/Put-Video-on-Your-iPod https://www.wikihow.com/Put-Videos-on-an-iPod-Touch

Proposed by Encik Tekateki (discuss • contribs) 04:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose because the existence of something elsewhere is not a valid reason to delete material from our collection. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 05:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Merge This could be a good page in the Wikibook Do-It-Yourself, rather then a standalone book with one page. --Mbrickn (discuss • contribs) 10:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Merge icon If I knew there is Wikibookbook like this, I wont nominate it to be deleted. I am also nominating it to be merge +1 to Do-It-Yourself . Voted by Encik Tekateki (discuss • contribs) 01:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Comment Afiact the Do-It-Yourself book doesn't cover software. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 01:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Dividedness

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.